µ±Ç°Î»ÖãºÊ×Ò³ > (½ËÕר°æ)2017¸ß¿¼Ó¢Óï¶þÂÖ¸´Ï°Óë²ßÂÔ µÚ1²¿·Ö רÌâ3 ÔĶÁÀí½â ÀàÐÍ7 ÎÄ»¯½ÌÓý½²Á·
ÀàÐÍ7| ÎÄ»¯½ÌÓý
¿¼²éÒªµã 1.ÎÄÕµÄÖ÷Ìâ¡£ 2£®ËùÊöÎÄ»¯½ÌÓýµÄ·¢Õ¹¡¢Ìص㡢¹¦ÄÜ¡£ 3£®²»Í¬ÎÄ»¯½ÌÓý¼äµÄÒìͬ¡¢Óŵ㼰ȱµã¡£ 4£®¼ÛÖµ¹Û¡¢µÀµÂ¹Û¡¢·çË×ϰ¹ßµÄÐγɡ£ ·½·¨¼¼ÇÉ 1.ץסÎÄÕµÄÄÚÔÚÂß¼¹ØÏµ£¬ÀíÇåÂöÂç¡£ 2£®¶¨Î»¹Ø¼üÐÅÏ¢´Ê¡¢Ö÷Ìâ¾ä£¬Ã÷È·Ö÷Ö¼¡£ 3£®ÖØµã¹Ø×¢ËùÊö¶ÔÏóµÄÌØÕ÷£¬²¢½øÐйéÄɸÅÀ¨¡£
(2016¡¤Ìì½ò¸ß¿¼¡¤C)
When John was growing up, other kids felt sorry for him.His parents always had him weeding the garden£¬carrying out the garbage and delivering newspapers.But when John reached adulthood, he was better off than his childhood playmates.He had more job satisfaction, a better marriage and was healthier.Most of all, he was happier.Far happier.
These are the findings of a 40£year study that followed the lives of 456 teenage boys from Boston.The study showed that those who had worked as boys enjoyed happier and more productive lives than those who had not.¡°Boys who worked in the home or community gained competence (ÄÜÁ¦) and came to feel they were worthwhile members of society£¬¡±said George Vaillant, the psychologist (ÐÄÀíѧ¼Ò) who made the discovery.¡°And because they felt good about themselves, others felt good about them.¡±
Vaillant's study followed these males in great detail.Interviews were repeated at ages 25, 31 and 47.Under Vaillant, the researchers compared the men's mental£health scores with their boyhood£activity scores.Points were awarded for part£time jobs, housework, effort in school£¬and ability to deal with problems.
The link between what the men had done as boys and how they turned out as adults was surprisingly sharp£®Those who had done the most boyhood activities were twice as likely to have warm relations with a wide variety of people£¬five times as likely to be well paid and 16 times less likely to have been unemployed.The researchers also found that IQ and family social and economic class made no real difference in how the boys turned out.
Working¡ªat any age¡ªis important.Childhood activities help a child develop
responsibility, independence, confidence and competence¡ªthe underpinnings (»ù´¡) of emotional health.They also help him understand that people must cooperate and work toward common goals.The most competent adults are those who know how to do this.Yet work isn't everything.As Tolstoy once said£¬¡°One can live magnificently in this world if one knows how to work and how to love, to work for the person one loves and to love one's work.¡±
46£®What do we know about John? A£®He enjoyed his career and marriage. B£®He had few childhood playmates.
C£®He received little love from his family. D£®He was envied by others in his childhood.
47£®Vaillant's words in Paragraph 2 serve as ________£® A£®a description of personal values and social values B£®an analysis of how work was related to competence C£®an example for parents' expectations of their children D£®an explanation why some boys grew into happy men 48£®Vaillant's team obtained their findings by ________£® A£®recording the boys' effort in school B£®evaluating the men's mental health C£®comparing different sets of scores
D£®measuring the men's problem solving ability
49£®What does the underlined word ¡°sharp¡± probably mean in Paragraph 4? A£®Quick to react. C£®Clear and definite.
B£®Having a thin edge. D£®Sudden and rapid.
50£®What can be inferred from the last paragraph? A£®Competent adults know more about love than work. B£®Emotional health is essential to a wonderful adult life. C£®Love brings more joy to people than work does. D£®Independence is the key to one's success.
ÓïÆª½â¶Á£º±¾ÎÄÊÇһƪ¼ÐÐð¼ÐÒéÀàµÄÎÄÕ¡£Ô¼º²Ð¡Ê±ºò¸¸Ä¸»áÈÃËû¸ÉһЩÁ¦ËùÄܼ°µÄ»î¶ù£¬³¤´óºóËû³ÉÁËÒ»¸ö¸ü¿ìÀÖµÄÈË¡£ÓÉ´Ë¿ÉÒÔ¿´³ö£ºÍ¯ÄêµÄÀͶ¯ÊǷdz£ÖØÒªµÄ¡£Ëü¿ÉÒÔÅàÑøº¢×ÓµÄÔðÈθС¢¶ÀÁ¢ÐÔ¡¢×ÔÐÅÐÄÒÔ¼°½â¾öÎÊÌâµÄÄÜÁ¦¡£ÕâÊǾ«Éñ½¡¿µµÄ»ù´¡£¬ÓëÆä¾«²ÊµÄ³ÉÄêÉú»îϢϢÏà¹Ø¡£
³¤ÄѾä½â¶Á£º¡°Boys who worked in the home or community gained competence and
came to feel they were worthwhile members of society£¬¡± said George Vaillant£¬the psychologist who made the discovery.
·ÖÎö£ºÒýºÅÄڵľä×ÓΪ¸´ºÏ¾ä¡£BoysÖ®ºóΪwhoÒýµ¼µÄ¶¨Óï´Ó¾äÐÞÊÎBoys£¬¶øthey were worthwhile members of societyΪ±öÓï´Ó¾ä£¬×÷feelµÄ±öÓï¡£ÒýºÅÍâwho made the discoveryΪ¶¨Óï´Ó¾äÐÞÊÎthe psychologist¡£
·Ò룺×ö³öÕâ¸ö·¢ÏÖµÄÐÄÀíѧ¼ÒGeorge Vaillant˵£º¡°ÔÚ¼ÒÖлòÉçÇøÀͶ¯µÄÄк¢Äܹ»»ñµÃÄÜÁ¦²¢ÇÒ¸ÐÊܵ½ËûÃÇÊÇÓмÛÖµµÄÉç»á³ÉÔ±¡£¡±
46£®A [ϸ½ÚÀí½âÌâ¡£¸ù¾ÝÎÄÕµÚÒ»¶ÎÐÅÏ¢¡°He had more job satisfaction£¬a better marriage and was healthier.¡±¿ÉÖª£¬Ô¼º²¶Ô×Ô¼ºµÄ¹¤×÷ºÍ»éÒöºÜÂúÒ⣬¹ÊÑ¡AÏî¡£]
47£®D [ÍÆÀíÅжÏÌâ¡£µÚ¶þ¶ÎÖУ¬Vaillantͨ¹ý40ÄêµÄÑо¿µÃ³ö½áÂÛ£ºÄÇЩСʱºòÔÚ¼ÒÀï»òÕßÉçÇøÀïÀͶ¯µÄÄк¢»ñµÃÁËÄÜÁ¦£¬¸Ðµ½×Ô¼º¶ÔÉç»áÓмÛÖµ¡£ÕýÒòΪËûÃÇ×ÔÎҸоõºÃ£¬ËùÒÔ±ðÈËÒ²¾õµÃËûÃǺá£ÓÉ´Ë¿ÉÖª£¬ÕâЩ»°½âÊÍÁËһЩÄк¢³ÉÄêºó¸ü¿ìÀÖµÄÔÒò£¬¹ÊÑ¡DÏî¡£]
48£®C [ϸ½ÚÀí½âÌâ¡£¸ù¾ÝÎÄÕµÚÈý¶ÎÐÅÏ¢¡°Under Vaillant£¬the researchers compared the men's mental£health scores with their boyhood£activity scores.¡±¿ÉÖª£¬VaillantµÄÍŶÓÊÇͨ¹ý±È½ÏһЩ·ÖÊýÀ´µÃ³ö½áÂ۵쬹ÊÑ¡CÏî¡£]
49£®C [´ÊÒå²Â²âÌâ¡£¸ù¾ÝÎÄÕµÚËĶÎÐÅÏ¢twice as likely to ...£¬five times as likely to ...and 16 times less likely to ...¿ÉÖª£¬ÈËÃÇͯÄêµÄÐÐΪºÍ³ÉÄêºóµÄ×´¿öÖ®¼äµÄÁªÏµÃ÷ÏÔµÃÈÃÈ˳Ծª¡£sharp´Ë´¦ÒâΪclear and definite(Çå³þºÍÈ·¶¨µÄ)£¬¹ÊÑ¡CÏî¡£]
50£®B [ÍÆÀíÅжÏÌâ¡£¸ù¾ÝÎÄÕÂ×îºóÒ»¶Î¿ÉÖª£¬Í¯ÄêµÄÀͶ¯Äܹ»°ïÖúÒ»¸öº¢×ÓÅàÑøÔðÈθС¢¶ÀÁ¢ÐÔ¡¢×ÔÐÅÐĺÍÄÜÁ¦£¬ÕâЩ¶¼ÊÇÒ»¸öÈ˾«Éñ½¡¿µµÄ»ù´¡£¬emotional healthÊDZ¾¶ÎµÄÖ÷Ì⣬¹ÊÑ¡BÏî¡£]
A
(2016¡¤ÄÏͨ¡¢ÑïÖÝ¡¢Ì©ÖÝ¡¢»´°²µÚÈý´Îµ÷ÑÐ)
A report released this month found that grouping children by ability is on the rise again¡ªteaching students in groups of similar ability has improved achievement for fast and show learners alike¡ªand who wouldn't want bright kids to be able to move ahead£¬or strugglers to get the help they need?
But for most kids£¬labels (±êÇ©) applied early in life tend to stick£¬even if
they are wrong.
Sorting school children by ability has long been controversial. In some countries£¬especially in Asia£¬school£wide tracking (·ÖÁ÷) remains normal.Children are tested and placed in different schools that direct them toward professional or vocational careers.Movement between the tracks is rare.
School£wide tracking decreased in U£®S.schools in the 1960s and 70s.It never died out£¬though.Sorting students into separate tracks for math at about junior high school age continues to be common£¬and other forms of tracking persist as well.
Unlike tracking£¬which means sorting students into separate classrooms£¬ability grouping happens within classrooms. When done according to the latest research£¬it has proven to promote achievement.
Ability grouping is changeable and temporary. Within classrooms£¬students might be divided into different learning groups dealing with materials of different levels.Any students who master concepts can move upward between groups£¬and the student groups might look different from subject to subject and unit to unit.For instance£¬a student who stands out in language arts might be at an average or slower level in math.A student who flies through multiplication tables might need extra help with fractions.Students who lag in reading can be pulled out of the classroom in small groups for practice with a tutor until their reading improves.
Research shows ability grouping within classes has more positive benefits than tracking.However£¬that must be weighed against the challenges involved.In many regular classrooms£¬the differences between student ability levels are very big. That presents challenges for teachers and low£performing students to constantly compare themselves with students who seem to fly through school with ease.
The rigid ability groups and tracking of the past are still with us in many schools.Likely£¬labels are applied with more caution than in the bad old days when some teachers gave reading groups not£so£secret code names like ¡°Bluebirds¡±£¬¡°Robins¡±£¬¡°Crows¡± and ¡°Buzzards¡±£®But kids still know.
±¾Ô·¢²¼µÄÒ»Ï¸æ·¢ÏÖ£¬½«¶ùͯ°´ÄÜÁ¦·ÖÀàÕâÒ»ÏÖÏóÔٴγÊÉÏÉýÇ÷ÊÆ¡£½«Í¬Ò»¿ÎÌÃÄÚµÄѧÉú°´ÄÜÁ¦·Ö×é±ÈѧУ·ÖÁ÷ÓÐןü»ý¼«µÄºÃ´¦¡£ÕâÖÖ·Ö×é·½·¨ÓÐÒæÓÚ²»Í¬ÄÜÁ¦Ë®Æ½µÄѧϰÕß¡£
1£®Why is grouping children by ability becoming popular again? A£®Because most teachers do not like slower learners. B£®Because grouping children should be done early in life.
¹²·ÖÏí92ƪÏà¹ØÎĵµ