所得税缴费点选址问题英文

time is too long, at the same time that the other three points to reduce the number of taxes, making its use rate reduce. (3 ) the last residents to nearby principle to income tax point walking rate also differs very far, pay taxes 13 walking rate was 2, significantly larger than the other three pay points walk rate, affected the residents of payment time. Question three:

Topic 1 Tax migration makes location is more reasonable, by the issue of two, point 2 and point 15 fee payment are irrational, paying 2 per capita distribution is not uniform, payment 15 walking rate is not reasonable, so consider the migration issue, should from the two pay point.

2 payment. 1

2 3 5 7 8 9 10 11

The sum 6 payment.

4 6 18

15 payment.

15

?

20 0 26 28 66 60 30 28 30 288

18 0 36

0

15 48 40 10

Q

?(k)

50 45 45 40 36 32 32 30 30 340

0.4 0 0.578 0.7 0.868 0.833 0.937 0.933

1 0.976

0.375

3.6

17 16

The sum 13 payment.

12 13 14

The sum

36 24 60

28 0 32 60

10 20 30 36 25 20 81 3.6 1.2 2 0.778

1.6 1.07

The original toll point walking rate table 1 Pay point 2 12 6 13 205 1.126 1、2、5、7、8、9、10、 128 1.234 3、11、12、 111 0.414 4、6、16、17、18 60 1.633 13、14、15、

The new scheme four pay points and the number of distribution table

The number of tax point source Q ?(k)

将缴费点从15迁移到12处后的人数分布情况12%缴费点241"%缴费点6缴费点12缴费点1325% The original plan four pay the amount distribution table

First we on payment of 2 analyses: to pay 2 to pay the largest number, if the transfer fee of 2, will result in a 340 change together pay sites, but it adds to the payment difficulty. Payment 2 at the downtown location, if the migration, will be subject to traffic, weather and other factors, increased mobility difficulty.

Secondly we analyze the payment: payment 15 point at the fringe of the city, to the payment 15 payment number is minimal, if

migration is not too many factors, and the payment of

15walkingrate is the most unreasonable.

In conclusion, transfer payment 15 is the most rational choice. And this table in the transfer knowledge, by 15 per point walking rate, according to the comparison, discovered 5 and 12 toll payment walking rate and per capita arrangement is relatively reasonable, so we carried out a detailed analysis of the above

two.

Question four:

By three, when moved to move to pay 5, numbers were balanced, residents walk rate is moderate, so that, the payment has certain practicability and efficiency, can use this point as the new location of a reference point, in according to the question the calculated location all walk far rate, see 5 points is the most suitable site location. So we make the following analysis.

Pay point 2 5 6 13 15 The number of tax point source 2、3、9、10、11 1、5、7、8 4、6、18 12、13、14 15、16、17 Q 182 158 98 81 45 ?(k) 0.462 0.538 0.511 0.471 1.333

The original plan four pay points and the number of distribution table

在5处新建缴费点后的人数分布83%缴费点2缴费点5缴费点6缴费点13缴费点1517(%

The original plan of the tax point number distribution

By the toll distribution graph, we found a new tax point number 5, more balanced distribution, especially the 2 tax, from the original 340000 numbers reduced to 182000 today the number of people, greatly easing the tax point 2 staff working pressure. So we draw the conclusion: if a new tax, should be set in the

5 division.

Model assessment

Advantage

( 1) all the data were given formula, design the index, thus when the portion of the data changes, is easy to calculate, has

certain universality.

( 2) in the evaluation of the reasonableness of the site, given the multiple evaluation standard, appropriate to the actual.

Defect