当前位置:首页 > 我院围术期预防性使用抗菌药物的干预对照研究
龙源期刊网 http://www.qikan.com.cn
我院围术期预防性使用抗菌药物的干预对照研究
作者:丁利华
来源:《中国当代医药》2013年第19期
[摘要] 目的 调查本院围术期预防性应用抗菌药物情况,对比分析临床药师对合理使用抗菌药物的干预作用。 方法 收集临床药师未干预手术病例260例及药师参与干预后的手术病例260例,对比分析干预前后围术期预防性应用抗菌药物情况。 结果 干预后用药时机不合理的比例由干预前80.39%降低到6.92%,抗菌药物平均应用时间由干预前9.6 d减少到4.2 d;围术期抗菌药物预防性应用的合理性明显提高,伤口感染率无明显改变,但仍存在无指征使用抗菌药物、用药疗程偏长、剂量偏大等问题。 结论 外科围术期预防性使用抗菌药物可以降低并发症发生率,但在使用期间需要区分患者的病症情况,再进行用药,降低患者药物使用的剂量,避免药物使用过度,临床干预可以有效提高患者的用药合理性,但还需要进一步地加强干预管理。
[关键词] 外科围术期;预防;抗菌药物;对照研究
[中图分类号] R95 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2013)07(a)-0014-03 Intervention-control study of preventative application of antibiotics in perioperative period in our hospital
DING Li-hua
Gao'an Municipal Hospital in Jiangxi Provence, Gao'an 330800, China
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the preventative application of antibiotics in the perioperative period in our hospital and compare and analyze the invention effect of clinical pharmacists on the
rational antibiotics use. Methods 260 cases of surgical records before the intervention and 260 cases of surgical records after the intervention of the clinical pharmacists were collected. The preventative application situation of antibiotics in the perioperative period before and after the intervention was compared. Results After intervention, the incidence of unreasonable drug use reduced from 80.39% to 6.92% and the average application time of antibiotics reduced from 9.6 days to 4.2 days; the reasonability of the preventative application of antibiotics in the perioperative period improved
significantly and the wound infection rate did not change obviously, but there were problems such as the application of antibiotics without indications, overlong medication course and overlarge dosage. Conclusion The preventive application of antibiotics in the perioperative period can reduce the
patients' incidence of complications, but the symptoms of patients should be distinguished before the drug use in order to reduce the drug dosage and possible overdose of patients. Clinical intervention
共分享92篇相关文档