2018年美国大学生数学建模竞赛F题优秀论文翻译及解读

a name withthe person’s picture attached? Your model should design a pricing structure forPI.

Task3: Not long ago, people had no knowledge about which agencies had purchasedtheir PI, how much their PI was worth, or how PI was being used. New proposalsare being put forth which would turn PI into a commodity. With the pricingstructure you generated in Task 2, establish a pricing system for individuals,groups, and entire nations. With data becoming a commodity subject to marketfluctuations, is it appropriate to consider forces of supply and demand for PI?Assuming people have control to sell to their own data, how does this changethe model?

Task4: What are the assumptions and constraints of your model? Assumptions andconstraints should address issues such as government regulations (e.g. priceregulations, specific data protections such as certain records that may not besubject to the economic system) and cultural and political issues. Based onyour model and the political and cultural issues, consider if informationprivacy should be made a basic human right when thinking about policy recommendations.Consider introducing a dynamic element to your model by introducing the

variationsover time in human decision-making given changing personal beliefs about the worthof their own data (e.g. personal data such as name, address, picture),transaction data (e.g. on-line purchases, search history), and social mediadata (e.g. posts, pictures).

Task5: Are there generational differences in perceptions of the risk-to-benefitratio of PI and data privacy? As generations age, how does this change themodel? How is PI different or similar to PP and IP?

Task6: What are the ways to account for the fact that human data is highly linkedand often each individual’s behaviors are highly correlated with others? Dataon one person can provide information about others whom

they

are

socially,professionally,

economically,

or

demographically connected. Therefore, personaldecisions to share one’s own data can affect countless others. Are there goodways to capture the network effects of data sharing? Does that effect the pricesystem for individuals, subgroups, and entire communities and nations? If communitieshave shared privacy risks, is it the responsibility of the communities toprotect citizens’ PI?

Task7: Consider the effects of a massive data breach where millions of people’s PIare stolen and sold on the dark web, sold as part of an identity theft ring, orused as ransom. How does such a PI loss or cascade event impact your model? Nowthat you have a pricing system that quantifies the value of data per individualor loss type, are agencies that are to blame for the data breach responsible topay individuals directly for misuse or loss of PI?

Task8: Write a two-page policy memo to the decision maker on the utility, results,and

recommendationsbased your policy modeling on this issue. Be sure to specify what types of PI areincluded in your recommendations.

Yoursubmission should consist of:

?

One-page Summary Sheet,

? ?

Two-page memo,

? ?

Your solution of no morethan 20 pages, for a maximum of 23 pages with your summary

?

and memo.

?

Note: Reference list andany appendices do not count toward the 23-page limit and

?

shouldappear after your completed solution.

2018年美赛F题赛题翻译 2018 ICM F题：隐私费用

电子传播和社交媒体的普及和依赖已经变得普遍。其中一个结果是，有些人似乎愿意分享关于他们的个人交互，关系，购买，信仰，健康和运动这方面的私人信息（PI），而另一些人则将认为对于这方面的隐私保护非常重要且有价值。不同领域的隐私选择也有显着差异。例如，一些人愿意放弃购买信息的隐私，以求得价格的降低，但同时他们不太愿意分享有关其疾病状况或健康风险的隐私。同样，如果某些人群认为个人信息构成了个人或社区风险，他们可能不愿意放弃特定类型的个人信息。其风险可能涉及安全，金钱，贵重物品，知识产权（IP）或个人电子身份的损失等方面。其他风险包括职业尴尬，失去职位或工作，社交损失（友谊），社会耻辱或边缘化。虽然对政府表示异议的政府工作人员可能愿意为保留其社交媒体数据而付费，但一位年轻的大学生可能不会对限制他们发表政治观点或社会信息感到任何压力（译者注：即他们不会为保留社交媒体数据付费）。网络空间中个人信息保护，互联网和系统安全的个人选择似乎可以在自由，隐私，便利，社会地位，经济利益和医疗等方面使得风险和回报共存。