¹ý³Ì×°±¸Óë¿ØÖƹ¤³Ì ÉÂÎ÷¿Æ¼¼´óѧÎļþ¼ìË÷ Ä£°æ - ͼÎÄ

Creation year 2003 Online? yes

URL http://www.ica.org/biblio.php?pdocid=38 Most recent access date 18/02/2004 Description

This bibliography provides a comprehensive list of sources about archival buildings, and can be used by anyone seeking information on this topic. It has been updated to include works up to 2003.

Area(s) of speciality

Conservation, Preservation, and Storage Statements of responsibility

Arnold den Teuling and Ted Ling, ICA Committee on Archival Building in Temperate Climates (ICA/CBTE)

Intended audience(s) - IRMT Archivists

Records Managers/Practitioners -- All Categories of Records Creating agency details

Name International Council on Archives Type Professional Association Website http://www.ica.org Country International Other information Copyright information

? International Council on Archives / Conseil International des Archives, 60, rue des Francs-Bourgeois, 75003 Paris, France. Primary contact details

Name International Council on Archives Email ica@ica.org

Telephone +33 (0) 1 40 27 6306 / +33 (0) Fax +33 (0) 1 42 72 2065

Address 60 rue des Francs-Bourgeois 75003 PARIS, France Back to search results

Getting in touch Contact us Press office Jobs and careers Site help FAQs A-Z index Accessibility About us

Terms of use Cookies Freedom of information Websites Legislation Labs Directgov

The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 4DU. Tel: +44 (0) 20 8876 3444.

2£® ÐÅÏ¢×ÊԴϵͳÃû³Æ

EBSCO Publishing Service Selection

Page

Êý¾Ý¿âÃû³Æ£º Academic Source Premier ¼ìË÷;¾¶£º Ö÷Ìâ

¼ì Ë÷ ´Ê£º Subject elevator

¼ì Ë÷ ʽ£ºSubject and elevator

¼ìË÷½á¹û£º ¢Ù ÃüÖмǼÊýÄ¿ ¢Ú ¿½±´ÃüÖÐƪÊýµÄƪÃû

¢Û ¼Ç¼һƪÓë¿ÎÌâÏà¹ØµÄÎÄÕªÐͶþ´ÎÎÄÏ×¼°ÈÎÑ¡Ò»

¸öÊý¾Ý¿âÏÂÔØһƪԭʼÎÄÏס£

Ò»£® ÕÒµ½17ƪ·ûºÏ¼Ç¼

¶þ . 1. The elevator illusion results from the combination of body orientation and egocentric perception.

2. Dynamic multibody modeling for tethered space elevators

3£®The influence of age and dental status on elevator and depressor muscle activity. 4£®Non-invasive assessment of motor unit anatomy in jaw-elevator muscles. 5£®Reproducibility of surface EMG variables in isometric sub-maximal contractions of jaw elevator muscles.

6£®Usage of tilt-in-space, recline, and elevation seating functions in natural environment of wheelchair users. 7£®Surface EMG of jaw elevator muscles: effect of electrode location and inter-electrode distance. 8£®A validation of a posture matching approach for the determination of 3D cumulative back loads. 9£®Surface EMG of jaw-elevator muscles and chewing pattern in complete denture wearers.

10£®Reaction times for allocentric movements are 35 ms slower than reaction times for target-directed movements.

11.Design and analysis of a scaled model of a high-rise, high-speed elevator

12£®Visual properties of objects affect manipulative forces and respiration differently. 13£®Anterior digastric muscle responses to sudden unloading of the mandibular elevator muscles in younger and older adults. 14£®Mathematical and empirical proof of principle for an on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD).

15£®Correlation between elevator muscle activity and direction of sagittal closing pathway during unilateral chewing.

16£®The Pattern of Extra-Ocular Muscle Involvement in Ocular Myasthenia. 17£®The choice between allocation principles: Amplifying when equality dominates

Èý£®The Pattern of Extra-Ocular Muscle Involvement in Ocular Myasthenia.

ͼÏñ תµ½È«²¿ 8 ͼÏñ

×÷Õß:Cleary, Marie1 marie.cleary@northglasgow.scot.nhs.uk Williams, Graeme John2 Metcalfe, Richard Andrew3

À´Ô´:Strabismus (09273972); Mar2008, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p11-18, 8p, 1 Black and White Photograph, 3 Charts, 4 Graphs ÎÄÏ×ÀàÐÍ:Article

Ö÷ÌâÓï:*MYASTHENIA gravis *VISION disorders *DIPLOPIA

*BLEPHAROPTOSIS *EYE -- Movements

*EYE -- Movement disorders ×÷ÕßÌṩµÄ¹Ø¼ü×Ö:diplopia extra-ocular muscles fatigability

Myasthenia gravis ocular motility ocular myasthenia ptosis

ÕªÒª:Background: The ocular motility (OM) deficit in myasthenia has not been studied systematically. Anecdotal reports yield no consensus, with the pattern mimicking infranuclear, internuclear or supranuclear disorders. The current study defines the pattern of extra-ocular muscle (EOM) weakness at presentation for a group of newly diagnosed untreated ocular myasthenics (OMG). Methods: Cases referred to one consultant neurologist (RAM) between 1991 and 2001 were reviewed. EOM weaknesses were quantified using an established scoring method in 49 patients with OMG and 49 age- and sex-matched controls, to differentiate age-related changes from those secondary to myasthenia. Results: Bilateral and multiple EOM weaknesses were typical. Only 6 cases mimicked isolated cranial nerve palsy. Weakness of the elevator muscles (superior rectus and inferior oblique) was common in both the OMG and control groups, but the amount of weakness was significantly greater for the myasthenia group (p = 0.003). All control subjects had a normal range of depression. EOM weaknesses for the control group were not confined to the older subjects. Discussion: This is the first detailed analysis of EOM involvement in ocular myasthenia. The EOM weaknesses for the control group were invariably bilateral and symmetrical, mainly involving the superior recti. The preponderance for involvement of the elevator muscles is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Strabismus (09273972) is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

×÷Õßµ¥Î»:1Orthoptic Department, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

2Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK 3Southern General Hospital, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Glasgow, Scotland, UK ISSN:09273972

DOI:10.1080/15569520701830992 Èë²Ø±àºÅ:30106125

Êý¾Ý¿â: Academic Source Premier ³ö°æÕ߻ձê:

ͼÏñ:ÏÔʾȫ²¿ 8 ͼÏñ ÏÔʾ½ÏÉ٠ͼÏñ FIGURE 1 TABLE 1 FIGURE 2 ËÄ£®Ô­Ê¼Îļþ

The choice between allocation principles: Amplifying when equality dominates Daniel Eek

Go¨teborg University, Go¨teborg, Sweden Marcus Selart

Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen, Norway One hundred and ninety participants (95 undergraduates and 95 employees) responded to a factorial survey

in which a number of case-based organizational allocation tasks were described. Participants were asked to

imagine themselves as employees in fictitious organizations and chose among three allocations of employeedevelopment

schemes invested by the manager in different work groups. The allocations regarded how such investments should be allocated between two parties. Participants chose twice, once picking the fairest and once

the best allocation. One between-subjects factor varied whether the parties represented social (i.e., choosing

among allocations between two different work groups) or temporal comparisons (i.e., choosing among

allocations between the present and the following year). Another between-subjects factor varied whether

participants?in-group was represented by the parties or not. One allocation maximized the outcome to one party,

another maximized the joint outcome received by both parties, and a third provided both parties with equal but

lower outcomes. It was predicted that equality, although always deficient to both parties, would be the preferred

allocation when parties represented social comparisons and when choices were based on fairness. When parties represented temporal comparisons, and when choices were based on preference, maximizing the joint outcome

was hypothesized to be the preferred allocation. Results supported these hypotheses. Against what was predicted, whether the in-group was represented by the parties or not did not moderate the results, indicating that

participants?allocation preferences were not affected by self-interest. The main message is that